Total Pageviews

Friday, March 12, 2021

I'm not even mad, that's impressive hiding the readiness salami




So I happened to see this over at USNI.

Navy's Infamous INSURV Reports Set to End This Year Unless Congress Acts - USNI News

Somewhere a Navy legislative affairs officer (I am  not sure what their official title is) is groaning. 

About what you say? this little thing called INSURV. 

For those not familiar this is the drill Sergeant white glove inspection for surface ships. 

While you might pass it, you never get a perfect score  and failure is a real and terrifying option. 

Failure often but not always gets skippers fired.  Just depends on how bad big navy made readiness availabilities. 

If your ship was skipped for like 10 years you might get a pass

In any case what INSURV does do it give everybody whom can read it a (theoretically ) clear snapshot of the material readiness of a grey hull bought and paid for by the taxpayers. 

It also can show you the results of delayed maintenance availabilities and extended deployments 

And it is really embarrassing for the navy to have many of its premier assets fail or not perform well.

So a little history (and I am going to date myself a bit here) of INSUV well back in my day driving grey hulls we had some degree of advance warning that we would have an insurv..I think it was about 6 months to a year.  And it was something that generated real fear. 

As  young Ensign hearing a LCDR XO talk about it was like hearing about the boogey monster and the apocalypse all rolled into one. And it was. 

The objective was to survive - although you knew they would find lots of things wrong and make you look fairly dumb. 

After all the inspectors at INSURV new their stuff well and all the tricks you as a grey hull would try to use to make you look better. They were back in my day terminal O-5's and above whom gave no thought of delivering devastating reports. Because it a ship was jacked up then sailors might die because systems either did not work or sailors did not know how to operate them. 

I would love to read the INSURV reports for McCain and Fitzgerald prior to their respective collisions.

Broadside cartoon below says its all.

In any case the old advance notice gave us all the time in the world to essentially game the inspection. In fact if you did fail, you had very little excuse. This is not to say it would be pretty.

The games that were played...missing something - go borrow it from another ship and return it the day after inspection. Don't have someone whom can do x y or z ditto.

At some point in time they reduced the advance warning from months to weeks. Which makes it a lot harder to game the system, and the inspection as well as produce more accurate realistic assessment of the material condition and readiness of a grey hull. 

In short I am all for it.

But for big navy (Washington DC Navy) this is not good.

Which means in rough terms if our grey hulls were getting say A and B grades under the old system, they are now getting Cs D's and F's. 

The reports have long been a headache for the Navy because they often paint an unfavorable picture of the fleet’s readiness. The assessment for FY 2020 – unveiled last week – found that ship readiness decreased in the last three years. A string of negative INSURV reports prompted the Navy to classify the assessments in 2008, but the service later began producing unclassified versions of the reports.

In short the report card being generated is not very good. So what do you do when your report card sucks, well lets just eliminate the  report card. That way mom and dad (in these case Congress) won't know you failed and take away the car keys and your Xbox.

That they classified it, i am on the fence about that one. I am not sure what we are protecting when our ships go out looking like this. I think its pretty clear that there is likely alot of things broken on this ship. 


So it looks like (no clue whom did it) some legislative affairs staffer snuck a provision into the 2019 that 

While INSURV has existed for 139 years for the purpose of examining the service’s ships, Congress included a provision in the Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act stipulating that a report would no longer be required after Oct. 1, 2021 

I am guessing that enterprising staff officer go an EP out of that. However, and thankfully it looks like the gig is up as another enterprising member of some congressional staff discovered the shenanigans and plans to make sure mom and dad get their report card. 

So I guess its 

Wednesday, March 3, 2021

Laugh or Cry part 2

 Really don't know what to think of this:



With the submarine threat on the rise, the US Navy looks to autonomous water sensor drones (defensenews.com)


"The drone would need to be able to operate for 90 days at a time, dive to depths of up to 200 meters – or 657 feet – and take a sample every 2 seconds, according to documents posted to Naval Information Warfare Systems Command’s website"


"
The Navy wants the drone to be able to loiter at depth or on the bottom, be able to transmit data when it surfaces via iridium satellite or a line-of-site datalink and be recoverable by either a survey ship or a vessel of opportunity"

 These specs are like 2000's era specs. In short orgs like Woods Hole and MBARI (Monterey) and Scripts have been using slocum gliders since about that time .

I mean I did an open marker survey while attached to a foreign navy back in 2003-2005 and you would think that people at Naval Information Warfare Systems Command would do the same before putting this out. 

There is literally no need to develop this. It was developed something like 20 years ago and operational 15 years ago 


See this article from 2008..so we seem to be issuing an RFP for tech this is over 15 years old and can be purchased of the shelf picture below is from 2012 when we lost one near Bermuda

Unidentified Floating Object In Bermuda's Waters - Bernews




Xconomy: Bluefin Sells Sub to Horizon Marine, Competes with iRobot for Big Navy Contract


"Bluefin, a 1997 spinoff of the AUV Laboratory at MIT’s Sea Grant College Program, licenses the technology behind the Spray Glider from the Scripps Institute of Oceanography "


"in the course of a single mission, the Spray Glider can dive and ascend 800 times, going as deep as 1,500 meters and covering a total distance of 4,000 kilometers. Every time the vehicle surfaces, it uses GPS to get a fix on its position, and sends the data it’s collected back to controllers via an Iridium satellite phone connection. (The Seaglider and the Slocum Glider function much the same way; all three vehicles were developed in response to an Office of Naval Research challenge to the scientific community about 10 years ago to build an “autonomous ocean sampling network.”)


"Bluefin has been manufacturing the Spray Glider for oceanographic research organizations and military agencies since 2004. But the Horizon deal marks the first time that Bluefin has supplied the craft to a commercial client. “The contract is important to us in that it’s really the first time that the oil and gas industry has come to look at this platform,” says Jeff Smith, Bluefin’s director of programs. “Traditionally this has been an academic research vehicle. The Navy has recently looked at using it for data collection to give advantage to the warfighter, and now with this Horizon Marine contract we’re seeing it in real-time applications for commercial oil and gas exploration.”

Smith couldn’t divulge the size of the contract, but he says that each Spray Glider vehicle costs about $100,000 when fully equipped with conductivity, temperature, and depth sensors. (Which isn’t much when you compare it to the $30,000 per day it can cost to send out manned oceanographic survey ships.)"

Naval Information Warfare Systems Command, if you want I think I still have my market survey on an old thumb drive...happy to give it to you as a starting point:) 


or ask purdue university:

Agile underwater glider could quietly survey the seas - Purdue University News


Place-trading AUVs designed for longer oceanographic missions (newatlas.com)

looks like l-3/harris is going to get a contract soon :) The requirements seem tailor made  

L3Harris’ IVER AUV: Multi-Mission Capability (defensenews.com)